Bobo, solo.

Oh, gawd.  Bobo has decided to wax rhapsodic over “Big and Little Loves.”  He babbles that life is full of small attachments held close, but great loves too big to contain are not so common.  In the comments “craig geary” from Redlands, FL had this to say:  “It was your republican party, and your party’s leaders Mr. Brooks who eviscerated the thriving post WW II American economy.  It was your party who perpetrated trickle down, the tax free life of the 1%, perpetual war in the Middle East, gutted unions, offshored industry, deregulated Wall Street.  It was ReaganBushBush who combined to raise the debt ceiling 28 times over 240 months of inept, largely criminal, misrule.  The big love is buried in veteran’s cemeteries from coast to coast.  The big money accrued to the war profiteering swindlers of KBR/Halliburton, Blackwater, SAIC, the for profit torturers of CACI and the thieves of Wall Street.”  If we could only believe that Bobo actually READS any of the replies to his PsOS.  Well, FSM help us all, here he is:

Ever since the days of ancient Greece, philosophers have distinguished between the beautiful and the sublime. Beauty is what you experience when you look at a flower or a lovely face. It is contained, pleasurable, intimate and romantic. Sublime is what you feel when you look at a mountain range or a tornado. It involves awe, veneration, maybe even a touch of fear. A sublime thing, like space or mathematics, over-awes the natural human dimensions and reminds you that you are a small thing in a vast cosmos.

Recently neuroscientists have shown that the experiences of beauty and awe activate different parts of the brain.

The distinction between the beautiful and the sublime is the distinction between the intimate and the transcendent. This sort of distinction doesn’t just happen in aesthetics, but in life in general. We have big and little loves.

The soldiers who we honored on Memorial Day were animated by a big love — serving their country — and by a little one — protecting their buddies. Religious people experience a love of God that is both big and little.

Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik wrote that God is in one guise majestic and infinite, the author of the universe. But when Soloveitchik’s wife lay on her deathbed, God did not appear that way. Instead, he appeared as a “close friend, brother, father. … I felt His warm hand, as it were, on my shoulder, I hugged His knees, as it were. He was with me in the narrow confines of a small room, taking up no space at all.”

In daily life we have big and little loves, too. The little loves, like for one’s children, one’s neighborhood or one’s garden, animate nurture, compassion and care. The big loves, like for America or the cause of global human rights, inspire courage and greatness. A little love is a shepherd protecting his flock. A great love is Martin Luther King Jr. leading his people.

The small attachments serve as the foundation of our emotional lives, but when you have a big love for your country or a cause, you are loving something that transcends a lifetime. You are pursuing some universal ideal and seeking excellence. A big love involves using power well, seeking honor and glory and being worthy of them.

The amount of big love in a society can rise and fall. Alexis de Tocqueville wondered if democracy would dampen Americans’ big love. “What worries me most,” he wrote, “is the danger that, amid all the constant trivial preoccupations of private life, ambition may lose both its force and its greatness, that human passions may grow gentler and at the same time baser, with the result that the progress of the body social may become daily quieter and less aspiring.”

I’d say that in America today some of the little loves are fraying, and big love is almost a foreign language. Almost nobody speaks about the American project in the same ardent tones that were once routine.

Big love is hopeful, but today pessimism is in vogue. Big love involves a confidence that one can use power well, but today Americans are suspicious of power, have lost faith in leaders and big institutions and feel a sense of impotence in the face of big problems.

Big love involves thinking in sweeping historical terms. But today the sense that America is pursuing a noble mission in the world has been humbled by failures and passivity. The country feels more divided than unified around common purpose.

Big love involves politics, and thus compromise, competition and messiness. Americans today are less likely to discern the noble within the grittiness of reality. The very words that the founders used to describe their big love for their country sound archaic: glory, magnanimity, sacred honor and greatness.

There is, in sum, less animating desire in the country at the moment, and therefore less energy and daring. The share of Americans moving across state lines in search of opportunity has fallen by more than half since the 1970s. The rate of new business creation is down. Productivity is falling for the first time in three decades. Economic growth is anemic. There’s a spiritual and cultural element behind these trends.

So I write today in defense of big love, the love not only of your little platoon but of the grand historical project this country represents. Young people now want to join start-ups or NGOs, or eat locally grown foods, but I’m writing in defense of the big love that once inspired big projects, like NASA, the national railroads and the creation and maintenance of the postwar, American-led world order, with the free movement of people, goods and ideas.

Before the country can achieve great things it has to relearn the ability to desire big things. It has to be willing to love again, even amid disappointments — to love things that are awesome, heroic and sublime.

Oh, he is SO full of crap.  How full?  Let’s let “gemli” from Boston tell us:

“Mr. Brooks, you should have written this column the morning of November 9, 2008, the day following Barack Obama’s historic election. Mayhap the long knives of Mitch McConnell and his co-conspirators would have been sheathed?

“Big love,” you continue, “involves politics, and thus compromise, competition and messiness.” Had you penned these lines seven years and almost eight months ago, you may have done a patriotic service (big love) in warning off a racist Congressional coup determined to handcuff the new president simply because “we, the people,” were animated by a “big love,” a profound rejection of a corrupt and feckless administration that thought war was a toy, a game, that the further widening between rich and poor was a “big hate” that was justified by an “ambition that lost both its force and greatness…and grew baser” with the acquiescence of a lazy electorate.

You end your lament by writing that in America today there is less “glory, magnanimity, sacred honor and greatness.” I hope that you took the time to read the transcript of President Obama’s address at the Hiroshima Memorial. The moving eloquence of this president who reached back into the dawn of the nuclear age to remind us of the awful possibility of of the past repeating itself with the “energy and daring” to forever end its rule over our lives. Not a single Republican politician commented upon this demonstration of “big love” by our president. Not one.

What does that tell you of America’s greatness?”



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: