Krugman’s blog, 3/10/16

There was one post yesterday, “Fundamentals, Polls, and the Primary:”

The huge polling miss in Michigan was a cautionary tale: for all its excellence, FiveThirtyEight is only as good as the polls, which at least this time were way, way off. It’s too soon to dismiss them, but not too soon to explore other approaches, which is what Alan Abramowitz has just done. Using data for the Dem contests so far, he estimates a simple relationship based on just two factors — nonwhite share of the population, and north versus south — that accounts for the results quite well — and Michigan is not an outlier.

If this model is right — and bear in mind that until Michigan polls were doing pretty well, so it may be a special case — next Tuesday won’t go as well for Clinton as the polls predict, with Sanders quite possibly winning three states. It’s important to remember, however, that Democratic delegates are allocated more or less proportionately, so that we would still be looking at a substantial Clinton gain in delegates. My back of the envelope says that she would widen her lead by 80-100 if Alan’s model calls it right.

What about later? There aren’t many more Southern states. On the other hand, after Tuesday almost half the pledged delegates will have been chosen, and to close the gap Sanders would have to win big in what remains. The back of my envelope says that he would need to win the rest of the primaries by something like a 14-16 point margin, which seems unlikely. So even with this model, Clinton remains a strong favorite.

But this could go on for a long, long time. And people who say that it’s good for the Democratic party might want to look at the Sanders Twitter feed, which is, if you ask me, getting pretty ugly in a way the Clinton feed hasn’t.

We’ll know a lot more after next Tuesday.



One Response to “Krugman’s blog, 3/10/16”

  1. Oregondave Says:

    Reading Krugman is getting a bit wearisome lately, his being so far in the tank for Clinton. But perhaps his Sanders bashing is a sign he’s truly worried that Clinton doesn’t yet look to have a sure-fire lock on the nomination.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: