<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pasty Little Putz, Dowd, Friedman, Keller and Bruni</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mgpaquin.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/the-pasty-little-putz-dowd-friedman-keller-and-bruni/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mgpaquin.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/the-pasty-little-putz-dowd-friedman-keller-and-bruni/</link>
	<description>Dragging stuff out from behind firewalls</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candid Article</title>
		<link>http://mgpaquin.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/the-pasty-little-putz-dowd-friedman-keller-and-bruni/#comment-18886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Candid Article]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mgpaquin.wordpress.com/?p=3845#comment-18886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the article on nihilism not anarchy is quite off point. but it can be used like ee cummings to understand Leaves of Grass. You bestow the tribute of Sartre&#039;s Nothingness on the crowd which is wrong by nature and analysis. Specific logic to prove an instance point is not useful when digesting the logic of OBL. It may be useful to argue that McVeigh was a main theme in &quot;Law And Order&quot; but not to mistake him for Hitler is futile and worse worthless. We spent the greater part of the 80&#039;s building steel plants to deal with Japan that were smaller and economic while GM built bigger gas tanks. We learned nothing from the plane hijackers of the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s. So we learned nothing about OBL and our allies in the Mideast. Let me bring this down to a simpler compound. We learned nothing from Reagan boasting to bring down the Wall (see Pink Floyd), or Nixon and the Wall. By your logic we learned that walls separate us from a constant mix of culture. We missed the point entirely about the art of war. We have learned nothing about our enemies. Nothing from our allies. And for once you left out Bachmann&#039;s quest for success by calling her kind maddening but in reality all they really want is paper money. Paper. Money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the article on nihilism not anarchy is quite off point. but it can be used like ee cummings to understand Leaves of Grass. You bestow the tribute of Sartre&#8217;s Nothingness on the crowd which is wrong by nature and analysis. Specific logic to prove an instance point is not useful when digesting the logic of OBL. It may be useful to argue that McVeigh was a main theme in &#8220;Law And Order&#8221; but not to mistake him for Hitler is futile and worse worthless. We spent the greater part of the 80&#8242;s building steel plants to deal with Japan that were smaller and economic while GM built bigger gas tanks. We learned nothing from the plane hijackers of the 70&#8242;s and 80&#8242;s. So we learned nothing about OBL and our allies in the Mideast. Let me bring this down to a simpler compound. We learned nothing from Reagan boasting to bring down the Wall (see Pink Floyd), or Nixon and the Wall. By your logic we learned that walls separate us from a constant mix of culture. We missed the point entirely about the art of war. We have learned nothing about our enemies. Nothing from our allies. And for once you left out Bachmann&#8217;s quest for success by calling her kind maddening but in reality all they really want is paper money. Paper. Money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
